1 2026:CGHC:19337 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1851 of 2025 Arun Kumar Kaushal @ Arun Sen S/o Hagaru Ram Aged About 51 Years R/o Under Over Bridge, Amanaka, Raipur, District - Raipur (C.G.) --- Petitioner versus Shri Vishwadeep Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondent CONT No. 1841 of 2025 Dheeraj Bagh S/o Dhibo Bagh Aged About 44 Years Resident Of Under Over Bridge, Amanaka, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus Shri Vishwadeep Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent CONT No. 1852 of 2025 Rajesh Kumar Sahu S/o Amrood Ram Sahu Aged About 48 Years Resident Of Under Over Bridge, Amanaka, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus Shri Vishwadeep, Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondent BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2026.04.28 10:27:07 +0530 2 CONT No. 1853 of 2025 Siyaram Verma S/o Samay Lal Verma, Aged About 37 Years R/o Under Over Bridge, Amanaka, Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) ---Petitioner Versus Shri Vishwadeep Commissioner, Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) --- Respondent CONT No. 1854 of 2025 Ritesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Madan Lal Yadav Aged About 43 Years R/o Under Over Bridge, Amanaka, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus Shri Vishwadeep Commissioner Municipal Corporation Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For Petitioners : Mr. Shikhar Sharma, Advocate For Respondent : Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 27.4.2026 1. Heard. 2. These bunch of contempt petitions have been filed alleging non- compliance of the order dated 25.6.2024 passed in WPC No.3149/2024, Order dated 26.6.2024 passed in WPC No.3188/2024; Order dated 24.6.2024 passed in WPC No.3099/2024; Order dated 25.6.2025 passed in WPC No.3152/24 and Order dated 24.6.2024 passed in WPC No.3095/2024. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent submits that above mentioned orders under contempt have been complied with and representation filed by the petitioners have been decided. He further submits that copy of the same has been sent to the petitioners through Speed Post 3 as well as via WhatsApp and a copy was also forwarded to the counsel for the petitioners through WhatsApps. Learned counsel for the respondent also filed copy of order dated 27.3.2026 passed by Zone Commissioner, Zone No.7, Nagar Palik Nigam, Raipur (CG) before this Court and said copy of order be kept as part of the record. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays for time to seek instruction. 5. Perusal of the copy of the order passed by the respondent shows that orders under contempt have been complied with, therefore, nothing survives in the instant contempt petitions. Accordingly, the same are disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to avail such remedies as may be available to them in accordance with law against the order passed by the respondent. 6. Accordingly, the rule issued is discharged and contempt proceedings are dropped. No order as to costs. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini