HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 30767 of 2026 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Rupa, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Krishna Mani, learned counsel for the first informant and Shri O.P. Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 356 of 2026, under Sections 137(2), 65(1) of B.N.S. and Section 3/4(2) of POCSO Act, Police Station Robertsganj, District Sonbhadra, during the pendency of the trial. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case though there is no incriminating material against him. It is further submitted that there are material contradictions in the statement of the victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS as the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS has stated that she had left her home on her own free will and she had entered into matrimonial alliance with the applicant and lived with him as a married couple, whereas, the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS has stated that she was forcibly taken away by the applicant and committed rape on her. It is further submitted that there are two different records regarding her age and as per mark- sheet of Class V, the date of birth of the victim is 01.01.2013 and as per statement of the principal of the said school, the date of birth of the victim is 01.01.2012, however, there is no certificate of high school or certificate of school first attended and no radio-logical examination has been Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rupa Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Archana Kumari, G.A., Krishna Mani Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Rao .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) conducted for her age determination. It is further submitted that the medico legal report does not support the allegation of commission rape on her. It is further submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history and the applicant has been languishing in jail since 16.05.2026, in case, he is granted bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and would cooperate in the trial proceedings. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the first informant and learned A.G.A. have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail and it has been submitted by them that the victim is a minor girl aged about 14 years and the victim in her statement has stated that she was forcibly taken away by the applicant and he committed rape on her. 5. As per first information report, the applicant is said to have enticed away the daughter of the first informant, however, the victim has been recovered and there are material contradictions in the statement of the victim recorded under Sections 180 and 183 BNSS as the victim in her statement recorded under Section 180 BNSS has stated that she had left her home on her own free will and she had entered into matrimonial alliance with the applicant and lived with him as a married couple, whereas, the victim in her statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS has stated that she was forcibly taken away by the applicant and committed rape on her. It is further submitted that there are two different records regarding her age and as per mark-sheet of Class V, the date of birth of the victim is 01.01.2013 and as per statement of the principal of the said school, the date of birth of the victim is 01.01.2012, however, there is no certificate of high school or certificate of school first attended and no radio-logical examination has been conducted for her age determination. It is further submitted that the medico legal report does not support the allegation of commission rape on her. It is further submitted that the applicant is having no criminal history and the applicant has been languishing in jail since 16.05.2026. 6. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of the accused and taking into account overcrowded jails and heavy pendency of criminal cases before the trial BAIL No. 30767 of 2026 2 courts as well as considering the mandate of the judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Kapil Wadhawan vs Central Bureau of Investigation reported in 2025 SCC OnLine SC 3038 as well as guideline of this Court in the case of Maya Tiwari Vs. State of U.P. reported in 2024 SCC Online All 6765 regarding grant of bail and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7. Accordingly, the present application is ALLOWED. 8. Let the applicant- Rohit Kumar @ Rohit Rao involved in the aforementioned crime be released on bail, on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned, with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (ii) The applicant shall cooperate in the trial/investigation sincerely without seeking any adjournment. (iii) The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail. (iv) The applicant shall attend in accordance with the conditions of the bond executed by him. 9. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 10. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. Verification of mobile number and Aadhaar card of the applicant as well as sureties should be verified by the court concerned. 11. It is further directed that the trial court shall send the release order to the concerned jail through Bail Order Management System (BOMS) to BAIL No. 30767 of 2026 3 ensure early release of the applicant. 12. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the applicant through Jail Superintendent, Sonbhadra via e-mail or e-prison portal within 24 hours in compliance of the order of the Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re: Suo Motu Writ Petition (Crl.) No.4 of 2021 decided on 31.01.2023 reported in (2024) 10 SCC 685. October 1, 2026 RKM BAIL No. 30767 of 2026 4 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad