[2026:RJ-JP:26460] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10125/2026 URN: CRLMB / 18803U / 2026 Surgyan S/o Laddulal, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Mouja Banota, Police Station Surwal, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.), Presently Residing At Neelkanth Apartment Near Koral Park, Police Station Borkheda, District Kota. (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajveer Singh Gurjar with Mr. Kailash Chand Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 14/07/2026 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 13.05.2026 passed by the learned District & Sessions Judge, Baran, in Bail Application No.175/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station- Anta, District-Baran for the offences under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 61(2) of BNS, 2023 & Section 66-D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2026. He further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, offences are triable by Magistrate, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time. [2026:RJ-JP:26460] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10125/2026] 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has been made the accused merely on the account that a passbook and ATM card belonging to one Aman Suman were recovered from him. He submits that as per the bank account statements, one account reflects deposits amounting to Rs.5,24,282/- and withdrawals of Rs.5,18,982/- while the second account reflects deposits of Rs.6,40,000/- and withdrawals of Rs.6,39,000/-. He further submits that the petitioner is neither the account holder nor the petitioner was using any mobile number connected with the alleged account numbers. Therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the present bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 04.05.2026; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; trial will take considerable time, there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past and further the fact that the petitioner is neither the holder of the bank accounts in which the alleged deposits were made, this Court is of the opinion that the bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely- Surgyan S/o Laddulal [2026:RJ-JP:26460] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10125/2026] arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station- Anta, District-Baran, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/59