IMRAN ANSARI ALIAS IMRAN KHAN ALIAS IMRAN v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./10985/2025 · 2026-01-05
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1043 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 1043 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:JHHC:59 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 10985 of 2025
------ Imran Ansari @ Imran Khan @ Imran, son of Khalil Ansari @ Mohd. Najir, resident of Krishnanagar, Gumti Basti, Adityapur, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, District Seraikella (Kharsawan) .... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kumar Choudhary, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated : 05.01.2026
Bail petition filed by the petitioner- Imran Ansari @ Imran Khan @ Imran, who is in custody in connection with S.T. No.131 of 2022 arising out of Adityapur P.S. Case No. 54 of 2022 for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 427, 307, 147, 148, 504, 506, 440, 120B/34 of the IPC and Section 27 of the Arms Act pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Seraikella, is pressed into motion.
It is submitted by the learned counsel on behalf of petitioner that the petitioner was enlarged on bail on 18.07.2022 by the learned trial Court and for earning livelihood he had gone out of State, therefore, he could not appear on 23.01.2023, the date on which the case was fixed for framing of charge, consequently his bail petition was rejected. Petitioner has voluntarily surrendered on 27.08.2025 and undertakes not to misuse the privilege of bail.
Learned A.P.P. opposed the prayer for bail.
Under the circumstances, the above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/-(Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit
Uploaded 06.01.2026