Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10429 (CHH)

PREETI RAJPUT v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2129/2026 · 2026-03-01

Shri Parth Prateem Sahu

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 4 2026:CGHC:10690 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2107 of 2026 Smt. Dashoda Sinha W/o Shri Pardeshi Sinha Aged About 42 Years R/o Vill- Pinkapar, Post Patper, Tahsil- Dongargarh, District- Rajnandgaon C.G. --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director, Panchayat Sanchalnalay, Development Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, C.G. 3 - Deputy Director, Chhattisgarh State Audit, District Rajnandgaon C.G. 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, District Rajnandgaon C.G. 5 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon C.G. --- Respondents WPS No. 2140 of 2026 Ku. Komal Lariya D/o Shri Chinta Ram Lariya Aged About 38 Years R/o Vill - Tikrapara, Post And Tahsil - Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ---Petitioner ALFIZA BAIG Digitally signed by ALFIZA BAIG Date: 2026.03.03 10:45:18 +0530 2 / 4 Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director Panchayat Sanchalnalay, Development Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Deputy Director Chhattisgarh State Audit, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Dongargarh, District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents WPS No. 2129 of 2026 Preeti Rajput D/o Shri Rajkumar Rajput, Aged About 36 Years R/o Gandai Pandariya, Tahsil Chhuikhadan, District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan- Gandai, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - Director, Panchayat Sanchalnalay, Development, Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - Deputy Director, Chhattisgarh State Audit, District- Khairagarh Chhuikhadan - Gandai Chhattisgarh 3 / 4 4 - Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat, District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan - Gandai Chhattisgarh 5 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Chhuikhadan District- Khairagarh- Chhuikhadan - Gandai Chhattisgarh --- Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Love Kumar Ramteke, Advocate For State : Ms. Shailja Shukla, Govt. Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 02.03.2026 1. As common issue has been raised in all these writ petitions by petitioners, therefore they are being heard together and disposed of by this common order. 2. For convenience of this Court, WPS No. 2107 of 2026 is taken as lead case, in which following reliefs have been sought. 10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly issue direction to the respondents to make correct calculations as per Schedule 2 of the Pay Revision Rules, 2009. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly issue an appropriate writ for correct compliance in Annexure P/1 dated 18.10.2024. 10.3 This Hon’ble Court may kindly issue an appropriate writ to the respondent to grant salary as per Annexure p/3 to the petitioner. 10.4 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to grant any other relief or pass such other and further orders as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case in the interest of justice.” 4 / 4 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is entitled for revised pay scale pursuant to the circular issued by respondent no. 3 dated 18.10.2024 vide Annexure P-1, however, till date the said benefit has not been extended to petitioner. 4. Upon asking from learned counsel for petitioner, whether he has approached the authority by filing an appeal/representation seeking for reliefs as prayed by him in this writ petition, he submits that no such representation/appeal has been submitted by petitioner. 5. Learned counsel for State submits that if petitioner submits an appeal/representation raising all the grounds as raised in this writ petition, it will be considered in accordance with law. 6. On due consideration of submission made by learned counsel for the respective parties and nature of grievances raised in this writ petition, I find it appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage, permitting petitioner to submit a comprehensive representation raising all the grounds as raised in this writ petition before respondent no. 2 and 3 and, if such a representation is submitted, concerned authority shall consider and take decision on the representation to be submitted by petitioner, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a further period of three months from the date of receipt of the order. 7. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with aforesaid observation and direction. Certified copy as per rules. sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Alfiza