Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10427 (RAJ)

CHANNU SON OF AHMEDA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/4668/2021 · 2026-07-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:27080] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 4668/2021 URN: CRLMP / 8743U / 2021 Channu Son of Ahmeda, aged about 88 Years, Resident of Holi Ki Khut Suket P.S. Suket Tehsil Ramganj Mandi Dist. Kota. ----Accused-Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Non Petitioner 2. Hanifa Daughter of Ahmeda, aged about 65 Years, Resident of Fakir Mollah Suket Tehsil Ramganj Mandi Dist. Kota. ----Complainant-Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms.Arti Sharma, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/07/2026 1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No.99/2021, registered with Police Station Atru, District Baran for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468 & 471 IPC. 2. It has been averred in the instant petition that the petitioner has been falsely booked in the instant case by the complainant only with the view to extort money from him in fact, no such offence has been committed by the petitioner. Hence, interference of this Court is warranted. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer. 4. Heard and considered the submissions made at Bar and perused the material available on record. [2026:RJ-JP:27080] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-4668/2021] 5. The allegations levelled in the impugned FIR reveal commission of cognizable offence. The correctness of the allegations cannot be examined or adjudged by this Court while exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. Certainly, this task has been assigned to the Investigating Officer. 6. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner is at liberty to submit a representation before the Investigating Officer, who shall consider the same in accordance with law and would submit conclusion report of investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C. before the concerned Court, if the investigation is still lying pending. 7. In case, the conclusion report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has been submitted or charge-sheet has been submitted against the him, the petitioner would be at liberty to take all grounds, which have been taken before this Court and all defence at the appropriate stage of the trial, before the Trial Court. 8. With the aforesaid observations, the present criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application as well as all pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma/27