Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10426 (JHR)

SRI RANA SRI KRISHNA SINGH ALIAS RANA SHREE KRISHNA SINGH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/389/2025 · 2026-01-16

Rajesh Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:1114 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.389 of 2025 ----- Sri Rana Sri Krishna Singh @ Rana Shree Krishna Singh, son of Late Rana Ram Narayan Singh, resident of Rana Nivas, Abadganj, Ward No.24, S.P. Kothi Road, Daltonganj. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sri R. K. Agrawal, Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi. 3. Sri Hemant Bhagat, Executive Engineer, Water Resources Department, Design Division No.2, Medininagar, Palamau. .......... Opp. Parties. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Aditya Banerjee, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ashish Kumar, AC to SC (Mines)-I For O. P. No.2 : Mrs. Richa Sanchita, Advocate ----- Order No.14 Date: 16.01.2026 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their wilful and deliberate violation of the order dated 5th July, 2023 passed in W.P.(S) No.4551 of 2021. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the show cause affidavits filed on behalf of the State and the opposite party no.2 as well as the pension revision order dated 20th November, 2025 produced by the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2, there is no need to proceed further in the present matter. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is hereby dropped. 3. The present contempt case stands disposed of. 4. The petitioner is, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law for redressal of his subsisting grievance. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 16th January, 2026 Sanjay/ Uploaded on 16.01.2026