Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1042 (RAJ)

SNEHLATA SHARMA W/O SHRI PURAN MAL SHARMA v. JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

CW/5086/2026 · 2026-03-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11908] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5086/2026 Snehlata Sharma W/o Shri Puran Mal Sharma, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Villa No. 102, Paradise Anand, Sirsi Road, Sirsi, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, Indra Circle, Jawahar Lal Nehru Marg, Jaipur Through Its Secretary. 2. Mitendra Pratap Singh S/o Shri Raj Bahadur Singh, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Villa No. 101, Paradise Anand, Sirsi Road, Sirsi, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Punit Singhvi Mr. Rohan Jain Mr. Ishan Verma Mr. Naman Dadhich Ms. Shraddha Mehta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Kuri along with Mr. Ayush Sharma and Mr. Dharma Ram HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/03/2026 1. Mr. Amit Kuri, Advocate, who is on the panel of Jaipur Development Authority (for short ‘JDA’), puts appearance on behalf of JDA on the instructions of the Court. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for the respective parties. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that in case, after verification as being ordered by the [2026:RJ-JP:11908] (2 of 2) [CW-5086/2026] Appellate Tribunal, JDA, Jaipur, vide order dated 27.02.2026, any construction of the petitioner is found to be illegal, the JDA may be directed to serve a notice so that the petitioner can put up his case and can show his credentials, as regards the alleged illegal construction. 5. The learned counsel appearing for the JDA submits that in normal course whenever illegal construction is raised, the JDA issues notice to the concerned person and only thereafter, proceed further under the law. 6. Taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsels appearing for both the parties and so also the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems just and proper to dispose of the present writ petition with the observation that whenever the authority of the JDA proceeds under order of the JDA dated 27.02.2025 for verification of the construction alleged to have been raised by the petitioner, and if it is found to be illegal, the JDA shall proceed further only after issuing show cause notice to the petitioner of a reasonable period. 7. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 8. The stay application and pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /13