MAMTA WIFE OF LATE SHRI PAPPU RAM BHOPA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/5991/2024 · 2026-07-14
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10418 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10418 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26589] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5991/2024 URN: CRLMP / 12205U / 2024 Mamta Wife Of Late Shri Pappu Ram Bhopa, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Muhana, Jaipur At Paresent Resident Of In Front Of Gate No. 2 Of Janana Hospital, Near Resident Of Sushila Rawat, Azad Nagar, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Director General Of Police, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Ajmer.
4. Deputy Superintendent Of Police, Circle Ajmer (Rural) Ajmer.
5. Station House Officer, Police Station Gegal, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sushil Pujari for Mr. Damodar Prasad Pujari For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 14/07/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Investigating Officer for conducting fair and impartial investigation in the FIR No.152/2024, registered with the Police Station Gegal, District Ajmer for the offence punishable under Sections 106(1) BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the incident dated 15.07.2024, the aforesaid FIR was registered with Police Station Gegal, District Ajmer on 16.07.2024, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date fair and impartial investigation has not been conducted by the Investigating Agency, hence, appropriate directions be issued.
[2026:RJ-JP:26589] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5991/2024]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
5. Perusal of the record indicates that the aforesaid FIR in the instant matter has been registered on 16.07.2024 and on 04.08.2024, the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition with the aforesaid prayer, even without approaching the authorities concerned for redressal of his grievances.
6. Considering the above overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant petition granting liberty to the petitioner to submit a representation before the Superintendent of Police, Ajmer and Station House Officer, Police Station Gegal, District Ajmer for redressal of his grievances.
7. In case, such representation is submitted by the petitioner, it is expected from the concerned authorities to look into the matter and proceed with the matter in accordance with law, if the investigation is still lying pending.
8. In case, report under Section 173 Cr.P.C. has already been submitted by the Investigating Agency before the Court concerned, this order will not have any effect.
9. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/44