HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 10184 of 2026 Court No. - 71 HON'BLE RAJIV LOCHAN SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Learned counsel for the applicants, the Learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicants in Case Crime No.50 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 352, 110, 117(2), 118(1) of the B.N.S., P.S.- Achhnera, District- Agra, with a prayer to enlarge them on anticipatory bail as the applicants apprehend their arrest in the above-mentioned case. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants has contended that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. There are cross versions and both the sides claim to have received injuries. There are three injured in the present case and two injured from the side of the applicants. Similarly situation co-accused, Arvind Kumar and Pappu Singh, have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide the order dated 25.09.2026 passed in NABAIL No.10067 of 2026. The Learned counsel has further submitted that the applicants were not arrested during investigation and now once a charge sheet has been filed, they are no longer required for any custodial interrogation or recoveries. They may be considered for grant of anticipatory bail. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. 4. The Learned counsel for the informant and the Learned A.G.A. have opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail and have contended that three people were brutally assaulted by the accused persons including the applicants. The injured Ram Bharose has received injuries which were not Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kuldeep Singh Chahar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ramendra Singh @ Ravindra And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) only grievous in nature but were dangerous to life as his parietal and temporal bones were found fractured. The applicant Ravindra and the co- accused Pappu had both assaulted the injured using a Fawda. The injuries correspond to the weapons assigned and no indulgence may be granted to the applicants. 5. I have considered the submissions made by the Learned counsel for the parties and perused the material brought on the record. 6. It is not disputed that there are cross versions of the incident. Both the sides claim to have received injuries. Grievous injuries have been found on applicant No. 1. In his supplementary report, injury No. 5 which is a fracture of the maxillary bone on the right side has been opined by the Doctor to be grievous in nature. The injuries sustained by Ram Bharose have also been opined to be grievous in nature. At present, it would not be appropriate to hold as to which side is the aggressor. Similarly situated co-accused Arvind Kumar and Pappu Singh have been granted anticipatory bail by this Court. The applicants were not arrested during investigation and have no criminal antecedents. Once a charge sheet has been filed, they are no longer required for any custodial interrogation. 7. Taking into account all the facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, I deem it fit to enlarge the applicant on anticipatory bail. 8. In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the applicants is allowed. 9. The applicants - Ramendra Singh @ Ravindra and Sanjay Kumar, shall appear before the trial Court within four weeks from today and shall be released on bail on filing personal bond and surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- i. The applicants shall remain present before the trial Court on each date fixed unless exempted by the trial Court; ii. The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; NABAIL No. 10184 of 2026 2 iii. The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court; iv. The applicants shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness; 10. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the Court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. 11. It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and are not to be considered to be an opinion on the merits of the case. September 30, 2026 Kushal NABAIL No. 10184 of 2026 3 (Rajiv Lochan Shukla,J.) Digitally signed by :- KUSHAL AGRAWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad