Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10415 (ALL)

SANDHYA TIWARI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/16020/2026 · 2026-09-29

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 16020 of 2026 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent nos.1 and 2 as well as Mr. Shashi Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 & 4. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed with a prayer to direct the respondent no.4 to fix the salary of the petitioner as Headmistress from the date of her joining i.e. 01.07.2013 in Adarsh J.H.S. Brahamasthan, Azamgarh presently known as Composite School Adarsh Brahmasthan, Nagar Kshetra, Azamgarh and a further prayer to direct the respondent no.4 to pay the arrears with interest from the date she is working as Headmistress, within stipulated period. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is working as In-charge Headmistress from the date of her joining i.e. 01.07.2013 in Adarsh J.H.S. Brahamasthan, Azamgarh presently known as Composite School Adarsh Brahmasthan, Nagar Kshetra, Azamgarh. In view of the Government Order dated 16.07.2026 (the date of the G.O. has wrongly been mentioned as 16.07.2025), the petitioner is entitled to salary as well as arrears of salary. It is further submitted that the petitioner has submitted several representations before the competent authority for redressal of her grievance, but no decision has been taken thereon till date, therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.4/District Basic Education Officer, District-Azamgarh to decide the same. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent nos.3 and 4 submits that in case the Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anand Kr Srivastava, Pratibha Asthana Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shashi Prakash Singh Sandhya Tiwari .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) petitioner moves a fresh representation before the competent authority, the same shall be considered and decided, in accordance with law. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make a fresh representation, ventilating all her grievances, supported by all such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4/District Basic Education Officer, District-Azamgarh, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 30, 2026 K.N. WRIA No. 16020 of 2026 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad