Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CMP No. 8131 of 2026 in SA Sr No.99534 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27-03-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. SOUNTHAR CMP No. 8131 of 2026 in SA Sr No.99534 of 2024
1. Lakshmi W/o. Krishnasamy 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 2. Kamatchi W/o.Selvakumar D/o. Krishnasamy 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 3. Periyasamy S/o. Krishnasamy 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. ..Appellant(s) Vs
1. Angayee W/o. late. Periannan Chetty 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 2. Papayee W/o. Periyasamy 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 3. Rajiniganth S/o. late. Periyasamy 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. __________ Page1 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 8131 of 2026 in SA Sr No.99534 of 2024
4. Santhi W/o. Kaliyan S/o. late. Periyasamy 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 5. Rajammal W/o. Bojan Chetty D/o. late. Periannan Chetty 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 6. Poongavanam W/o. Raju D/o. late. Periannan Chetty 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 7. Selvaraj S/o. late. Periannan Chetty 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 8. Arukkani W/o. Ramachandran D/o. late. Periannan Chetty 3rd Ward, Esanai Village and Post Perambalur Taluk and Dist. 9. Chandrakanth S/o. Late. Periyasamy Abudhabi, U.A.E ..Respondent(s) Prayer: This petition has been filed to accept the cause title petition. For Appellant(s): Ms.R.Amrutha for Mr. G.Ilamurugu __________ Page2 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 8131 of 2026 in SA Sr No.99534 of 2024 ORDER This petition has been filed seeking to accept the cause title as the first defendant has not been impleaded as party in the second appeal on the ground that he is no more. 2. The petitioners/defendants 2 to 4 failed to implead the L.Rs of the first defendant in the second appeal. Without impleading the L.Rs of the first defendant, the petitioners are not entitled to get along with the second appeal, as the suit was filed for partition. Therefore, this court is not inclined to entertain this petition and accordingly, this civil miscellaneous petition is dismissed. 3. It is open to the petitioners to file a petition to implead the L.Rs of the first defendant along with condone delay petition.
27-03-2026 MST __________ Page3 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CMP No. 8131 of 2026 in SA Sr No.99534 of 2024 S.SOUNTHAR, J. MST CMP No. 8131 of 2026 in SA Sr No.99534 of 2024 27-03-2026 __________ Page4 of 4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis