Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10408 (UTT)

RAVINDRA DATT SEMALTI v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE TEHRI GARHWAL

WPMS/51/2025 · 2026-08-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010001892025 2026:UHC:7027 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/51/2025 Ravindra Datt Semalti --Petitioner Versus District Magistrate Tehri Garhwal and another --Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mohd. Umar, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Suyash Pant, Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, Advocate for the respondent. 2. According to the petitioner, he has made a representation to the Director, Rehabilitation; but, no decision is being taken thereupon. 3. Mr. Shobhit Saharia, learned counsel appearing for THDC, however, submits that there is no averment in the representation regarding the date on which petitioner’s land was acquired, the plot number, the extent of land acquired, the village, or anything else. He submits that such a representation cannot be decided. UKHC010001892025 2026:UHC:7027 4. This Court has perused the representation, enclosed as Annexure-1 to the writ petition. 5. This Court finds substance in the submission made by Mr. Saharia, Advocate. 6. The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.08.2026 Mahinder