2026:JHHC:820-DB -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 2106 of 2024 Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority, Adityapur Region (the then Adityapur Industrial Area Development Authority) represented through Yogen Mandi, son of Pitambar Mandi, aged about 44 years, Industrial Extension Officer, Jharkhand Industrial Area Development Authority Adityapur Region, having its office at Vikash Bhawan, P.O & P.S.-Adityapur, District - Seraikella-Khersawan. … … … Petitioner Versus 1. The Recovery Officer, Debt Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi through its Registrar, Pragati Sadan, RRDA Building, Kutchery Chowk, P.O. &, P.S. Lalpur, District - Ranchi. 2. UCO Bank, Sakchi Branch, through it's Branch Manager, having regd. office at 82, Purulia Road, SNP Area, P.O. & P.S. Sakchi, District - East Singhbhum. 3. Santosh Kumar, son of Late Deen Dayal Singh, resident of 88 Flat No. 1/3, M. Road, Bistupur, P.O. & P.S. Bistupur, Jamshedpur, District - East Singhbhum. 4. Mr. Akhileshwar Narayan Ray, Proprietor of M/s. Anupam Udyog, Resident of H. No. 20, H. M. Colony, Jawaharnagar, Mango, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Jamshedpur, District - East Singhbhum. … … … Respondents --------- CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD --------- For the Petitioner: Mr. V.P. Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. R.C.P. Sah, Advocate Mr. C.A. Bardhan, Advocate For Resp. No.2: Mr. Rohit Ranjan Sinha, Advocate Mr. Kumar Rahul, Advocate Mr. Arpit Khandewal, Advocate Mr. Nilanjan Chatterjee, Advocate --------- 06/Dated: 13.01.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Mr. V.P. Singh, learned Senior Advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioner, after arguing the matter for some time, and based on the instructions, seeks leave to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedies. 2026:JHHC:820-DB -2- 3. In fact, the learned counsel for the respondents had objected to the entertainability of this petition on the ground of availability of alternate remedies. 4. In the above circumstances, we see no difficulty whatsoever in acceding to the learned Senior Advocate’s request and allowing the petitioner to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail of the alternate remedies under the law. 5. All contentions of all parties are left open. The petition is disposed of with the above liberty. 6. No costs. (M.S. Sonak, C.J.) (Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.) 13.01.2026 N.A.F.R. APK/VK Uploaded on 14.01.2026