Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10407 (JHR)

RUBI KUMARI v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2039/2026 · 2026-03-16

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:7098 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2039 of 2026 Rubi Kumari, Aged about 24 years, Daughter of Munna Yadav, resident of NS Loda 12 Number, Near Raksha Kali Mandir, Lodna, Madhuban, P.O. Lodna, P.S. Lodna, District-Dhanbad, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kumar Sah, Advocate For the Opp. Party-State : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sarivastava, Advocate --- 02/16.03.2026 1. Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.01.2026 in connection with Saraidhela P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025, for the alleged offence registered under Sections 305(a) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the court of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that she was involved in stealing away one set of Kangan worth Rs. 1,67,807/- and cash of Rs.12,000/- from the room of a resort where marriage ceremony was to be solemnized. He submits that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. He submits that though husband of the petitioner has a number of criminal antecedent, but so far as the petitioner is concerned, she has only one criminal antecedent which relates to some fight with her neighbor. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner has two minor children one baby boy aged about 2½ years and one baby girl aged about 3½ years. He has submitted that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party-State opposed the prayer for bail. 2026:JHHC:7098 2 5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the submission that there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner and that the petitioner has two minor children to be take care of, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad in connection with Saraidhela P.S. Case No. 248 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 6. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through ‘FAX/E-mail’. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) 16.03.2026 Rakesh/- Uploaded on:-17.03.2026