55-WP-32-2026(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 32 OF 2026 Jagannath Rama Vadar (chiparikar) ...Petitioner Versus The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...Respondent —————— None for the Petitioner. Ms. Tejas J. Kapre, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh & Neeraj P. Dhote, JJ. Date : September 23, 2026. P. C. : 1. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner. We have perused the papers and proceedings. 2. By the Petition, the Petitioner seeks a direction to Respondent No. 2, the Collector, to decide the representation dated 8th September, 2025. Perusal of the representation would indicate that the Petitioner claims that, in the second appeal proceedings, there was a consent decree between the parties as regards partition of the subject land, and seeks the partition to be carried out as per the map. 3. It is open for the Petitioner to adopt execution proceedings for executing the consent decree. The Petition is clearly misconceived and stands dismissed. [Neeraj P. Dhote, J.] [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Jamadar - SL 1 of 1 2026:BHC-KOL:9153-DB