KAMAL SHARMA SON OF SHRI KISHAN LAL SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7479/2022 · 2026-07-15
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10405 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10405 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26947] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.7479/2022 URN: CRLMP / 12788U / 2022 Kamal Sharma Son Of Shri Kishan Lal Sharma, Aged About 75 Years, Resident Of Mig 1053, Veer Sawarkar Nagar, Heerapur, Raipur, Chhattisgarh Power Of Attorney Holder Of Bhagwati Lal Jain Son Of Late Shri Nathmal ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Jaipur (Raj).
3. Dy. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur North, Jaipur (Raj).
4. S.H.O. Of Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur West (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Bhagat Singh Sharma for Mr. Ajay Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 15/07/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the Investigating Officer for conducting fair and impartial investigation in the impugned FIR No.238/2022, registered with the Police Station Vaishali Nagar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 464, 465, 466, 467, 471, 474 and 120-B IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the alleged incident occurred in between 26.05.1999 to 09.03.2022, the aforesaid FIR was registered on 26.05.2022, but in-spite of passing of considerable time, till date the matter has not been investigated in fair and impartial way, hence, appropriate directions be issued.
[2026:RJ-JP:26947] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7479/2022]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposed the prayer.
4. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
5. Perusal of the record indicates that the impugned FIR has been registered with the concerned Police Station on 26.05.2022 and the petitioner has approached this Court by way of filing the instant petition on 18.08.2022 with the aforesaid prayer, even without approaching the authorities concerned for redressal of his grievances.
6. In the considered opinion of this Court, the petitioner is supposed to submit a representation before the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (West) and the Station House Officer, Police Station Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur (West) for redressal of his grievances.
7. In case, such representation is submitted by the petitioner, it is expected from the concerned authorities to look into the matter and proceed in accordance with law and submit the conclusion report of investigation under Section 173 Cr.P.C. expeditiously before the concerned Court, in case the investigation is still lying pending.
8. This order will not have any effect or bearing in case the conclusion report of investigation has already been submitted before the concerned Court.
9. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. The stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/35