APHC010189282023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE 17th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 213 OF 2023 Between: 1. GURIJALA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, S/o Gurijala Venkata Subba Reddy, Aged 42 years, Hindu, Business, R/o Kothapeta Village, Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District. ...Petitioner AND 1. BANKA VIJAYA BHASKAR REDDY, S/o Banka Lakshmi Reddy, aged 42 years, Hindu, Software Developer, R/o Kothapeta Village, Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District. Now working as Software Developer, Having office at 680, Folsom Street, 11th Floor, San Franciso CA 94107, USA, and Having Residence at. 4091, Park Centre Lane, APTBFREMONT, CA 94583, USA, Rep. through his GPA Holder, Banka Siva Sankar Reddy @ B.S.Sankar Reddy, aged about 46 years, S/o B. Lakshmi Reddy, Hindu, Employee, R/o Kothapeta Village, Proddatur Mandal, Kadapa District. At present working as Manager in Institute of Engineers, National Design Research Forum at Bengaluru, and Residing at 9, 17th Cross, BNS Garden, Muthyala Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore City, Karnataka State. ...Respondent pleased to allow the Appeal by setting aside the Decree and Judgment of the Learned II Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Proddatur dated.6.1.2023 rendered in O.S.No.58/2016 with costs to meet the ends of justice. IA NO: 1 OF 2023 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings after passing of the Decree and Judgment dated.6.1.2023 made in O.S.No.58/2016 on the file of the Court of the II Additional District Judge, Kadapa at Proddatur pending disposal of the above First Appeal in the interests of justice and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: K A NARASIMHAM Counsel for the Respondent V NITESH The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 213 OF 2023 O R D E R 1) A letter, dated 08.09.2026, has been addressed to the Registry by the learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant, stating that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties before the elders, outside the Court, and that, on the instructions of the Appellant, he seeks permission to withdraw the Appeal. The said letter is accompanied by a letter stated to have been addressed by the Appellant to his learned Counsel. 2) Learned Counsel for the Appellant further submitted that, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, the Appellant be permitted to seek refund of the Court fee. 3) Having regard to the submissions made by the learned Counsel for the Appellant, the letter addressed to the Registry and the instructions stated to have been furnished by the Appellant, and as no further cause survives for adjudication in the Appeal, the Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. 4) It is open to the Appellant to move an appropriate application before the competent Court for refund of the Court fee, in accordance with law. 4 As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI Date: 17.09.2026 SM 5 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI APPEAL SUIT NO: 213 OF 2023 Dated: 17.09.2026 SM