Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10401 (RAJ)

GOPAL YADAV SON OF SHRI RAMCHANDRA, v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/8094/2024 · 2026-07-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:27054] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 8094/2024 URN: CRLMP / 16641U / 2024 1. Gopal Yadav Son of Shri Ramchandra, Resident of Azad Nagar, Madanganj, District Ajmer (Raj). 2. Mukesh Son of Shri Norat Tailor, Resident of Azad Nagar, Madanganj, District Ajmer (Raj). 3. Manish @ Pappu Son of Sudarshan Daroga, Resident of Dev Dungri, Madanganj, District Ajmer (Raj). 4. Rajendra @ Goga Son of Ramswaroop, Resident of Azad Nagar, Madanganj, District Ajmer (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, Through P.P. 2. Sitaram Son of Shri Poonam Chand, Resident of Village Farasiya, Police Station Madanganj, District Alwar (Raj). 3. Smt. Ram Kanya Wife of Shri Poonam Chand Sharma, Resident Of Village Farasiya, Police Station Madanganj, District Alwar (Raj). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sharma with Ms. Kamini Pareek Mr. Jitendra Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/07/2026 Counsel for the petitioners submit that during the pendency of this petition, the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise. Hence, under the changed circumstances, the instant petition has become infructuous. Dismissed as rendered infructuous. [2026:RJ-JP:27054] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-8094/2024] Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/40