Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10400 (JHR)

DIPAK KUMAR ALIAS DEEPAK KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./11759/2025 · 2026-02-19

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:5014 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 11759 of 2025 ------ Dipak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar, aged about 21 years, son of Tiroti Mandal, resident of Village-Lata Sare, P.O.-Morne, P.S.- Mohanpur, Dist.-Deoghar … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Niranjan Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 19.02.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.129 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 319(2)/ 318(4)/338/336(3)/340(2)/61(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and under Section 66B/66C/66D/84(C) of I.T. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime by posing as phone-pe customer care officer and by giving false promises of lottery and also by deceiving gullible persons in the name of getting loan approved. It is further submitted that the mobile handsets along with sim cards recovered from the possession of the petitioner reveals that the same were involved in financial fraud and as per the CDR report, the seized mobile handset of the petitioner was used for creation of several e- wallets. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.13 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 14.09.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-II-cum Cyber Crime, Special Court, Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar (Cyber) P.S. Case No.129 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 19.02.2026 Gunjan-