Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10397 (HP)

NEK RAM v. NIPUN JINDAL AND OTHERS

COPC/680/2026 · 2026-05-27

Romesh Verma

Civil Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No. 680 of 2026 Date of decision : 27.05.2026 Nek Ram ...Petitioner. Versus Nipun Jindal & others ….Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner : Mr. Vikas Rajput, Advocate For the respondents : Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate __________________________________________________________________________ Romesh Verma, Judge (oral) The present petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging therein non-compliance of the judgment as passed by this Court in CWP No. 21085 of 2025, dated 02.01.2026. 2. Today learned counsel for the respondents has placed on record communication dated 27.05.2026 as addressed by Regional Manager HRTC, Palampur to the Financial Advisor & C.A.O Himachal Road Transport Corporation Shimla, whereby it has been communicated that amount of Rs.9,18,172/- as DCRG, interest at the rate of Rs. 60,943/-- and leave encashment at the rate of Rs 6,92960/- and the interest over the leave encashment of Rs. 45,944/- stood paid to the present petitioner. The said communication is taken on record. 3. Faced with above situation, learned counsel for the petitioner has acknowledged the same. Consequently, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant petition and the same is accordingly closed. However, it is made clear that in case any of the grievances still remains 1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 unaddressed, the petitioner shall be at liberty to revive the present proceedings by filing appropriate application. 4. The petition stands disposed of. Notices are discharged. (Romesh Verma) May 27, 2026 Judge (Veena)