27/04 2026 AD/31/24 266312 NANDY (DO) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side WPA/4160/2026 SOURAV MAJUMDAR VS THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS. Mr. Gaurav Purakayastha, Advocate Ms. Sushmita Choudhury, Advocate …...for the Petitioner Ms. Koyeli Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr. Bibek Dutta, Advocate Mr. Manas Bhattacharya, Advocate ……for the WBBSE Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Advocate Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate ……for the WBCSSC Ms. Tapati Samanta, Advocate …...for the State 1. Affidavit of service as filed, be kept with the record. 2. The petitioner is a candidate in the second State Level Selection Test (SLST) with a 55% mental disability. The petitioner is a patient of schizophrenia. 3. Mr. Purakayastha, learned Advocate appearing of the petitioner, submits that the candidature of the petitioner has been considered in the general category and not in the Physically Handicapped (PH) or Other Handicapped (OH) category. 4. The petitioner had made several representations which have not been considered by the Commission as to why he was treated as a General Category candidate in spite of giving all relevant documents regarding his disabilities. 5. In view of the afore-stated, the respondent no. 3 is directed to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 28.12.2025 by May 15, 2026 and the resultant order of such consideration be communicated to the petitioner 20.05.2026. 6. With the afore-stated directions, the writ-petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. (Reetobroto Kumar Mitra, J.) P a g e | 2