Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10397 (ALL)

BHAGWAT PRASAD v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13596/2026 · 2026-09-27

Dinesh Pathak

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13596 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE DINESH PATHAK, J. 1. Sri J. N. Maurya, learned counsel appearing for the contesting respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 has pointed out that the date of order and the year of the writ petition of earlier Writ Petition No. 20654 of 2019 was inadvertently mentioned as order dated 17.12.2015 and Writ- A No. 20654 of 2016. 2. Accordingly, on his request, first and second paragraph of order dated 2, September, 2026 passed by this Court is corrected in the following manner:- (i) Date of order should be read as understood 17.12.2019. (ii) Number of the writ petition should be read and understood as Writ- A No. 20654 of 2019. 3. In compliance with the order dated September 2, 2026, learned counsel for the contesting respondents submits that the maximum amount of dues has already been paid to the petitioner. However, a balance amount remaining payable to the petitioner, which shall be paid shortly. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that total amount of Rs. 9,15,033/- is still outstanding and remains to be paid. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served by keeping this writ petition pending. Accordingly, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to finally dispose of the present writ petition with a direction that the petitioner shall be at liberty to move a fresh representation before the Executive Officer (respondent no. 2) ventilating his grievance raised in the instant writ petition within a Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaytri Rajput, Indra Pal Singh Rajpoot Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., J.N. Maurya Bhagwat Prasad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) period of three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order and a self attested copy of the instant writ petition, who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months from the date of production of the same, if there is no other legal impediment. 6. With the aforesaid directions and observations, present writ petition stands disposed of. September 28, 2026 Israr WRIA No. 13596 of 2026 2 (Dinesh Pathak,J.) Digitally signed by :- ISRAR AHMAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad