Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10392 (KAR)

SMT. VENKATAMMA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/3787/2023 · 2026-02-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7924 CRL.P No. 3787 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 3787 OF 2023 BETWEEN: 1. SMT. VENKATAMMA W/O LATE.KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS 2. SRI K.SAMPANGI, S/O LATE KRISHNAPPA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. BOTH 1 AND 2 ARE RESIDING AT KEMPANAYAKANAHALLI JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI VENKATRAM, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY BANNERGHATTA POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7924 CRL.P No. 3787 of 2023 2. SRI ANJINAPPA, S/O LATE RAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS R/AT NO.100, IN FRONT OF VIJAYA BANK BANNERGHATTA ROAD KEMAPANAYAKANAHALLI JIGANI HOBLI, ANEKAL TALUK, BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.N.JAGADEESHA, ADDL.SPP FOR R-1; R-2 - DEAD) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C PRAYING TO QUASH THE FIR IN CR.NO.96/2018 DATED 25-04-20218 AND THE CHARGE SHEET DATED 29-06-2019 IN C.C.NO.1214/2019 PENDING BEFORE THE 1ST ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ANEKAL, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, U/S 143, 147, 148, 323, 341, 504, 506, 468, 420 R/W 149 OF IPC AGAINST THEM AND PASS SUCH OTHER RELIEFS AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT UNDER THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:7924 CRL.P No. 3787 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER The subject petition is filed on 02-05-2023. The learned Additional State Public Prosecutor submits that charges have been framed by the concerned Court and the evidence is on and the matter is at the fag end of trial. In view of the same, petition stands disposed in the light of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR KUMAR1. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE BKP List No.: 1 Sl No.: 201 1 (1994) 4 SCC 142