Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10392 (ALL)

NAVI RASUL v. SHIVAM RAI, SUB INSPECTOR/ INVESTIGATING OFFICER/ STATION HOUSE OFFICER AND ANOTHER

CAPL/6844/2026 · 2026-09-29

Vikas Budhwar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6844 of 2026 Court No. - 53 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. The present contempt application has been preferred alleging non- compliance of the order dated 30.03.2026 passed in Case Crime No. 382 of 2024 under Section 109(1), 351(2) of B.N.S., requiring the Investigating Officer to conclude the proceedings within a period of two months. 2. This Court on 28.09.2026 proceeded to pass the following order:- "1. The contention of the learned counsel for the applicant is that despite the existence of the order dated 30.03.2026 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Maharajganj, requiring the Investigating Officer/ opposite party to conclude the inquiry preferably within a period of 2 months but till date the same has not been concluded. 2. Let a copy of the contempt application be served upon Sri Pavan Kumar, learned Standing Counsel who shall seek instructions. 3. Put up this case on 30.09.2026 as fresh." 3. Today, instructions have been produced along with copy of the final report dated 29.09.2026. 4. In view of the same, the contempt application has outlived its utility, accordingly, the same is consigned to record. September 30, 2026 Rajesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Adeel Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : (Vikas Budhwar,J.) Navi Rasul .....Applicant(s) Shivam Rai, Sub Inspector/ Investigating Officer/ Station House Officer And Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAJESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad