Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1039 (RAJ)

SUGNA D/O SH. GHISA RAM W/O SH. MUKESH MARUKA v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/386/2026 · 2026-03-16

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:11131] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 386/2026 1. Sugna D/o Sh. Ghisa Ram W/o Sh. Mukesh Maruka, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Village Sadokan, Tehsil And District Nagaur (Raj.) At Present R/o Flat No. 506, 5Th Floor, C- Block, Ridhi Sidhi Sky 25, Keshavpura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. 2. Mukesh Maruka S/o Sh. Ramniwas, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Ward No. 15, Mundava Road, Kuchera, Tehsil And District Nagaur (Raj.) At Present R/o Flat No. 506, 5Th Floor, C-Block, Ridhi Sidhi Sky 25, Keshavpura, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. The Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 3. The Nodal Officer, Special Investigation Unit Crime Against Women Cell, Nagaur. 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Nagaur District Nagaur. 5. The Station House Officer Police Station, Rol, Jayal District Nagaur (Raj.) 6. The Station House Officer Police Station, Kuchera, District Nagaur (Raj.) 7. The Station House Officer Police Station, Karni Vihar, Jaipur (Raj.) 8. Ghisaram S/o Sh. Radhakishan, R/o Village Sadokan, Tehsil And District Nagaur (Raj.) 9. Rakesh S/o Sh. Ghisaram, R/o Village Sadokan, Tehsil And District Nagaur (Raj.) 10. Ramchandra S/o Sh. Ghisaram, R/o Village Sadokan, Tehsil And District Nagaur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, Dy.G.A.-cum-PP Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP [2026:RJ-JP:11131] (2 of 3) [CRLW-386/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 16/03/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.8 to 10 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj, Moti Katala, Jaipur, Rajasthan on 19.02.2026 and same has been registered on 19.02.2026. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.8 to 10 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.7-Station House Officer, Police Station Karni Vihar, Jaipur (Raj.) and respondent no.7 is directed to provide protection [2026:RJ-JP:11131] (3 of 3) [CRLW-386/2026] to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /255