SUNIL KUMAR S/O BRIJESH KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10662/2026 · 2026-07-14
Bipin Gupta
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10386 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10386 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26621] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous II Bail Application No. 10662/2026 URN: CRLMB / 19783U / 2026 Sunil Kumar S/o Brijesh Kumar, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Village Echer, Police Station Chauth Ka Barwada, District Sawai Madhopur. (At Present Confined At District Jail Sawai Madhopur). ---Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Umesh Dixit For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. G.A.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 14/07/2026
1. The first bail application filed by the accused-petitioner was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 11.06.2026 with liberty to file the bail application before the learned Trial Court after filing of the challan. Hence, the present second bail application has been filed after approaching the learned Trial Court.
2. The present second bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 03.07.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Sawai Madhopur, in Bail Application No.618/2026, whereby the bail application of the petitioner was rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station-Choth Ka Barwada, District-Sawai Madhopur for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 340(2), 303(2), 112(2), 61(2) (a) of BNS, 2023, Section 66-D of the Information
[2026:RJ-JP:26621] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10662/2026] Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008 & Section 13 of the Rajasthan Public Gambling Ordinance, 1949.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2026. He further submits that the challan in the case has already been filed, offences are triable by Magistrate. He further submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and, therefore, he prays that the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate vehemently opposes the present second bail application. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Government Advocate and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon a consideration of the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 01.05.2026; offences are triable by Magistrate; the challan has been filed; trial will take considerable time, there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner of having committed any offence of similar nature or any other nature in past, this Court is of the opinion that the second bail application filed by the petitioner deserves to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the second bail application is allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioner namely-Sunil Kumar S/o Brijesh Kumar arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.135/2026, Police Station-Choth Ka Barwada, District-Sawai Madhopur, shall be released on bail; provided he furnishes a personal bond of
[2026:RJ-JP:26621] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10662/2026] Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs. Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioner shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioner shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected; (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
(iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/70