MOHAMMAD NADEEM SON OF SHRI MOHAMMAD NASEEMUDDIN KHAN @ NASEEM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/10568/2022 · 2026-07-14
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10382 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10382 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:26562] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No.10568/2022 URN: CRLMP / 18830U / 2022
1. Mohammad Nadeem Son Of Shri Mohammad Naseemuddin Khan @ Naseem, Aged About 37 Years, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
2. Mohasin Khan Son Of Shri Mohammad Naseemuddin Khan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
3. Danish Khan Son Of Shri Mohammad Naseemuddin Khan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
4. Najakat Khan Son Of Liyakat Khan, Aged About 45 Years, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
5. Furkan Son Of Liyakat Khan, Aged About 42 Years, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
6. Naseemuddin Khan Son Of Nasir, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
7. Naseem Bano Wife Of Naseemuddin Khan, Aged About 55 Years, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi.
8. Najari Wife Of Najawat, Aged About 40 Years, R/o House No. 618, Masjid Teliyan, Sheesh Mahal, Chandani Mahal, Delhi. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Victim ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
[2026:RJ-JP:26562] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-10568/2022] Order 14/07/2026
1. By way of filing the instant criminal misc. petition, a prayer has been made to quash the impugned FIR No.848/2022 registered with the Police Station Jhotwara, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 376D, 344, 323 and 120B IPC.
2. At the outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court that after thorough investigation, the police has submitted the Final Report (Negative) in the aforesaid FIR on 29.03.2023 and the same has also been submitted before the concerned Court on 19.05.2023, hence under the changed circumstances, this petition has become infructuous.
3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the criminal misc. petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Stay application and all application (pending, if any) also stand dismissed.
4. A copy of the factual report is ordered to be retained on record.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J 5/Karan