[234] M/s Delhi A Ranbir Sing Coram : Present: PANKAJ J [1] filed agains [2] on filed ap dismissed b [3] execution o stands disp [4] repeatedly petitioner. [5] of the opin fit to entert to be dismi [6] disposed of 28.01.2026 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF AT CHANDIGA CR-362-20 Date of De Delhi Automobiles Private Limited versu ir Singh and another HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PA Ms. Shruti Sharma, Advocate f for the petitioner. **** KAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) This revision petition has ari against the present petitioner by the la Ex parte eviction order was pa iled application for setting aside of issed by both the Courts below. Learned counsel for the peti ution of the ex parte order passed by t s dispossessed. Present revision petition was f tedly adjourned thereafter on requ ioner. In view of the totality of facts e opinion that the petitioner having re entertain the present petition at this be dismissed. All pending miscellaneous ed off. .2026 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable T OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA DIGARH 2017 (O&M) of Decision : 28.01.2026 …Petitioner versus ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN ocate for Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate as arisen out of eviction proceeding the landlord. was passed. The present petitioner lat of ex parte order, which stand e petitioner does not dispute that ed by the Rent Controller, the petition was filed in 2017. The same has bee request made by counsel for th f facts and circumstances, this Court ing reconciled to the situation, it is this belated stage. The same is ordere neous application(s), if any, stand (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No cate eedings ner later stands that in etitioner as been for the Court is it is not ordered stands RAJNEESH SHARMA 2026.01.31 11:12 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document