Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10381 (BOM)

ABDUL HAQUE MAHMOOD KHAN AND ANR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

ABA/3524/2023 · 2026-09-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

16-aba3505-23.doc vai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3505 OF 2023 Anwarul A. Haque Abdul Haque Khan @ Rahman Khan & Anr. ...Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents WITH ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO.3524 OF 2024 Abdul Haque Mahmood Khan & Ors. ...Applicants V/s. State of Maharashtra & Anr. ...Respondents Ms.Samiksha Pawar for the Applicants in both the ABAs. Ms.Megha S. Bajoria, APP for Respondent No.1 – State in ABA No.3505 of 2026. Mr.Ashok S. Gawai, APP for Respondent No.1 – State in ABA No.3524 of 2026. CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , J. DATE : 23RD SEPTEMBER , 2026. P.C. :- 1. Learned counsel for applicants states that although the FIR bearing No.832 of 2023 was registered with Kandivali Police Station, Mumbai against this applicant with respect to several offences, the 1/2 VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Digitally signed by VASANT ANANDRAO IDHOL Date: 2026.09.23 18:33:57 +0530 16-aba3505-23.doc charge-sheet is filed for the offences which are all bailable in nature. Therefore, she submits that there is no apprehension of arrest and submits that the application has become infructuous. 2. Accordingly, the application is disposed of as infructuous. (PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) 2/2