1 / 2 2026:CGHC:20629 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 431 of 2026 Dev Narayan Kashyap S/o Late Ram Bhuvan Kashyap Aged About 58 Years Presently Posted As The Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Ambikapur, District- Surguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Secretary Forest And Climate Change Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Departmental Promotion Committee Through Its Chairperson, Forest And Climate Change Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur (C.G.) 4 - Mrs. Rich Sharma Additional Chief Secretary, Forest And Climate Change Department, Chhattisgarh Government, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Ms. Sonia Kuldeep, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Aditya Tiwari, P.L. HON'BLE SHRI PARTH PRATEEM SAHU, JUDGE ORDER ON BOARD 04.05.2026 1. Counsel for the petitioner submits that due to inadvertent mistake in Para No. 4 of the order passed in WPS No. 3066 of 2026 dated 08.04.2026, it is mentioned as representation before respondent No. 1 instead of the respondent No. 2 and 3. The appropriate authority to 2 / 2 consider the representation would be respondent No. 2 and 3 and therefore, direction be issued to the petitioner to submit representation before respondent No. 2 and 3. 2. Counsel for the State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer. 3. On due consideration of the submission of the counsel for the parties, this application is allowed and it is directed that the sentence ‘permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh comprehensive representation before respondent No. 1’ be read as ‘permitting the petitioner to submit a fresh comprehensive representation before respondent No. 2 and 3’ and further in subsequent line of the same paragraph it be read as ‘if such a representation is submitted before respondent No. 2 and 3’ instead of ‘respondent No. 1’. 4. With the above directions and observations, the MCC is allowed. Registry is directed to make this Order as part of the writ petition. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Saurabh JUDGE