Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10369 (ALL)

YOGENDRA KUMAR SINGH @ YOGESH AND 2 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

NA528/39884/2026 · 2026-09-27

Chawan Prakash

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 39884 of 2026 Court No. - 83 HON'BLE CHAWAN PRAKASH, J. 1. Heard Sri R.C. Maurya, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicants with the prayer to allow this application and quash the impugned order dated 21.08.2026 passed by the Civil Judge (Junior Division) Fast Track Court, Crime against Woman, Hathras (A-II) whereby the learned court dismissed the discharge application dated 23.06.2026 filed by the applicants in Misc. Case No. 236 of 2025 (State Vs Yogesh @ Yogendra and others), arising out of Case Crime No. 82 of 2025, under Sections 85, 115 (2), 351 (2) of B.N.S. and Section 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Mahila Thana, District Hathras, pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division), Fast Track Court, Crime against Woman, Hathras. 3. After the learned counsel for the applicants had argued at length, the Court put certain queries to him. In response, he gave up his challenge to the aforesaid impugned order against the applicants and confined his submission to requesting that the applicants be further given protection to enable them to surrender before the court concerned. The learned counsel for the applicants further stated at the Bar that he is not pressing any other prayer made in this application on merits and prayed that a direction be issued to the court concerned to consider and decide the bail application expeditiously, in accordance with law. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ramesh Chandra Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Yogendra Kumar Singh @ Yogesh And 2 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. for the State states that he has no objection to the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants for not pressing the other prayers made in the instant application. 5. In view of the above, it is directed that, in case the applicants appear before the concerned trial court within three weeks from today, and apply for bail, the bail application shall be considered and decided in view of law laid down by Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another: (2021) 10 SCC 773. Till the aforesaid period of three weeks or till appear before the Court, whichever is earlier, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicants in the aforesaid case. 6. With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of. September 28, 2026 Rmk. NA528 No. 39884 of 2026 2 (Chawan Prakash,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad