Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10361 (BOM)

SOU. SANJIVANI DATTATRAY KHANDEKAR v. SHRI. DATTARYA VISHWANATH KHANDEKAR

IA/6609/2026 · 2026-09-22

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

908 IA 6609 of 2026.doc Tikam IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION. INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 6609 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 8107 OF 2018 Sanjivani Dattatray Khandekar ...Applicant Vs. Dattatray Vishwanath Khandekar ...Respondent. _________________________________________________________________ Mr. Sriram A. Gawade a/w Sagar Tambe, Advocate for Applicant. Mr. Shubham Sonawale a/w. Ms. Sanika Said a/w. Saima Shaikh a/w. Abhishek Salunke i/by Vinod P. Sangvikar, Advocates for Respondent. _________________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER, 2026. P.C. : 1. Heard learned counsel for the Applicant and Respondent. 2. By this Application, the Applicant is seeking withdrawal of amount deposited by Respondent-husband. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondent strongly objected for withdrawal of the amount. 4. I have heard both learned counsel. As the Applicant is wife and Respondent has deposited the maintenance amount, considering this fact, I pass following order: ORDER (i) Interim Application is allowed. VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Digitally signed by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date: 2026.09.23 11:56:28 +0530 908 IA 6609 of 2026.doc Tikam (ii) The Applicant is permitted to withdraw the amount deposited by husband with interest, if any. (iii) Interim Application is disposed of. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)