Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1036 (CHH)

JSW MAHANADI POWER COMPANY LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/1268/2026 · 2026-03-22

Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:13743 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1268 of 2026 JSW Mahanadi Power Company Limited A Company Registered Under The Provisions Of Companies (Incorporation) Rules 2014 Having Its Registered Office At 8001, Survey No 109,q City Nanakramaguda Gachibowli Hyderabad (Telangana) Through Its Authorized Singatory Mr, Patrick Gomes S/o Sylvester A. Gomes Aged 39 Years Jsw Mahanadi Power Company Limited Authorized Signatory R/o L-1805 18th Floor Aparna Sarovar Zicon Opposite Aparna Sarovar Zenith Serilingampally Nalagandla Hyderabad (Telangana) --- Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary Department Of Water Resources Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Engineer In Chief Water Resources Department Shivnath Bhawan Sector -19, Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Chief Engineer Hasdeo Kachhar Water Resources Department Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Superintending Engineer Water Resources Division Raigarh District- Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - Executive Engineer Water Resources Division Janjgir Head Quarter Champa District- Janjgir-Champa (C.G.) 6 - Sub Divisional Officer Water Resources Sub- Division Champa District- Janjgir- Champa (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2026.03.30 18:28:34 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Shrivastave, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Malay Shrivastava and Ms. Kajal Chandra, Adv. For Respondents : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Dy. Adv. General. Hon'ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi Order On Board 23-3-2026 1. After arguing for some times, learned Sr. counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the State has no objection to allow above prayer. 3. In view of above submission made by learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner, this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner as sought for. 4. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge pathak