HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 39073 of 2026 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE SIDDHARTHA VARMA, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents and Ms. Anjali Upadhyay, learned counsel representing Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority are present. 2. Upon being pointed out about the mistakes in the writ petition, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the present writ petition and the same may be dismissed as not pressed with the liberty to file a fresh petition. 3. Learned Standing Counsel and learned counsel for the contesting respondent have no objection in case the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. September 28, 2026 Sumit S Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lalit Kumar Misra Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjali Upadhya, C.S.C. (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Siddhartha Varma,J.) Aims Green Avenue Welfare Association .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUMIT SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad