IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMP No. 380 of 2026 P. Srinivasa Rao ….. Petitioner None -versus- 1. State of Orissa 2. Superintendent of Police, Gajapati 3. Inspector in charge, Kishinagar, District-Gajapati 4. Gopi Sabar 5. Rama Sabar 6. Ganaswari Sabar 7. Radha Sabar 8. Sambi Sabar 9. Bulu @ Dema Sabar 10. Kartika Sabar 11. Abhiram Sabar 12. Damu Sabar 13. Gangasai Sabar 14. Sumitra Sabar 15. Yami Sabar 16. Sania Sabar 17. Padamua Sabar ….. Opposite Parties Mr. S.J. Mohanty, ASC CORAM: HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 07.04.2026 Order No. 01. (Through hybrid mode) 1. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called in the first hour for which the matter was passed over. 2. No counsel appears on behalf of the Petitioner after lunch when the matter is taken up. 3. The CRLMP has been filed with the following prayer: ““It is therefore prayed that your lordship would be graciously pleased (i) To Admit and allow the Crl.M.P and call the record from Opp. Party No. 2 and 3. And (ii) To issue rule NISI calling upon the Opp. parties for filing show cause, if the OPs fails to file show cause or file insufficient cause, then the rule may be made absolute against the Opp. Party No 2 and 3. And (iii) To issue writ of Mandamus directing to the opp. Party No 2 and 3 to register the FIR under Annexure- 1 and investigate the matter by arresting the accused persons (O.P. No. 4 to 17) as narrated in the Annexure-1, within a stipulated period and provide security to the petitioner and his family member during harvest of cashew nuts. And (iv) To pass any other order(s), relief(s), direction(s) your lordships deem fit and proper for the interest of justice, equity and fair play; And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. Annexure-1 is the complaint dated 27.03.2025 which is alleged to have submitted to the IIC, Kashinagar Police Station – Opposite Party No.3. The petition dated 29.03.2025 was allegedly sent to the S.P., Gajapati vide Annexure-2. The Petitioner has approached this Court after almost one year. 5. In similar applications i.e. CRLMP No. 374 of 2026, CRLMP puspa No. 319 of 2026 and CRLMP No. 318 of 2026, this Court has refused to entertain the CRLMP. The relevant portion of the order dated 30.03.2026 passed in CRLMP No. 374 of 2026 is extracted below: “4. Considering the nature of the allegations and the dates on which the Petitions have been sent to the Superintendent of Police, Gajapati, I am not satisfied that this is a fit case to exercise discretionary power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to direct the Opposite Party Nos.2 and 3 to register a case on the written complaint of the Petitioner after almost one year.” 6. In view of the nature of allegation and delay in approaching this Court, I do not consider this to be a fit case to issue any direction to the Opposite Parties No.2 and 3 to register a case. 7. The CRLMP is accordingly dismissed. 8. Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application. (Savitri Ratho) Judge