HPSEB & Ors. Vs. Murat Singh (deceased) through LRs. CMPs No. 3038, 12410 & 12411/2026 in RFA No. 08/2017 29.05.2026 Present: Mr. Yashveer Singh Rathore, Advocate, for the non-applicants/appellants. Mr. Ranvir Chauhan, Advocate, for the applicants/respondents. CMP No. 12410/2026 The present application under Order 1, Rule 10(2), read with Section 151 CPC has been filed by the applicants for their substitution, being legal representatives of respondent No. 1, Murat Singh, who expired on 24.10.2017. As per the applicants, deceased respondent No. 1 during his lifetime, executed a Will in favour of Romita and Vanshika. The other legal representatives of the deceased challenged the said Will before the learned Civil Judge, Jubbal, District Shimla, H.P. by way of Civil Suit, which was compromised before the Lok Adalat and all the legal representatives of deceased Murat Singh became the rightful holder. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of one of the applicants namely Romita, death certificate of the deceased, copy of order of Lok Adalat and copy of mutation. ...2…. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non-applicants/appellants has no objection in case the same is allowed. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, the same is allowed and the applicants, as mentioned in para-2 of the application, are substituted as party respondents in the present proceedings in place of deceased respondent No. 1. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 3038/2026 The present application under Section 151 of CPC has been filed on behalf of the applicants/respondents, for release of the enhanced awarded amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court. The application is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants. No reply to the application is intended to be filed and learned counsel for the non-applicant/appellants has no objection in case the prayer made in the application is allowed, as no appeal has been preferred ...3... against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavits of all the applicants, coupled with the fact that till date, no appeal has been preferred against the judgment passed by this Court and the same has attained finality, the same is allowed and the enhanced awarded amount, lying deposited in the Registry of this Court, alongwith up-to-date interest, is ordered to be released in favour of the applicants/respondents, as per their respective shares, after proper verification and identification, by remitting the same to their bank accounts, details whereof have been mentioned in para-1 of the application. The application stands disposed of. CMP No. 12411/2026 For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the applicants are exempted from filing English translation of Annexures P-1 and P-2. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 29th May, 2026(raman)