Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10347 (UTT)

BHARAT SINGH v. SARVESH KUMAR

WPMS/2387/2026 · 2026-08-10

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

UKHC010138492026 2026:UHC:7046 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/2387/2026 Bharat Singh --Petitioner Versus Sarvesh Kumar and another --Respondents Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mohd. Safdar, Advocate for the petitioner. 2. Petitioner is defendant in a suit for permanent injunction. Learned Trial Court allowed the temporary injunction application filed by plaintiff. Petitioner filed appeal against that order, which has been dismissed by learned Additional District Judge, Haridwar on 29.05.2026. Thus, feeling aggrieved, petitioner has approached this Court challenging the order passed by Trial Court as affirmed by Appellate Court. 3. Since Grant of temporary injunction is discretionary and learned Courts below have considered all relevant aspects, including prima facie case, irreparably injury and balance of convenience for deciding the prayer made by plaintiff for temporary injunction, therefore, this Court do not find any reason to interfere in the matter. 4. Thus, there is no scope for interference. 5. The writ petition is, however, disposed of with a request to learned Trial Court to make endeavour to decide the suit at an early date. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 10.08.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED9A86DAA B21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.08.11 09:50:47 +05'30'