Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:27036] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 9523/2026 URN: CRLMB / 17665U / 2026 Vasim Son Of Rajak, Aged About 31 Years, R/o Village Sahsan, Ps Jurhara, District Deeg (Raj.) (At Present Accused-Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7547/2026 URN: CRLMB / 13750U / 2026 Sahwaj S/o Abdul Rasid, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Nagla Jamalgarh, Police Station Punhana, District Nuh (Haryana) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7811/2026 URN: CRLMB / 14230U / 2026
1. Astak S/o Juhru, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Kasba Jurhara, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 2 Moin Khan S/o Aas Mohammad, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Kasba Jurhara, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). 3 Mohid S/o Shahid, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Sabalgarh, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Sub Jail Deeg). ----Accused-Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent
[2026:RJ-JP:27036] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-9523/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sinsinwar Mohd. Shakir Khan Mr. Ajay Kumar Sain Mr. Ankit Khandelwal Mr. Mukesh Kumar Sain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Naresh Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA
Judgment / Order 16/07/2026
1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS, 2023 against the order dated 07.05.2026 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge Kaman, District-Deeg, in Criminal Misc. Bail Application (CIS) Nos. 645/2026, 623/2026 & 627/2026 respectively, whereby the bail applications of the petitioners were rejected in connection with F.I.R. No.126/2026, Police Station-Jurhera, District-Deeg for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2) 313 & 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023, and Section 66D of the Information Technology (Amendment) Act, 2008.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have no criminal antecedents of having committed any offence of a similar nature in the past.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that the challan has already been filed. Moreover, the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time and even the offences are triable by the Magistrate, therefore, he prays that the petitioners may be enlarged on bail as the accused-petitioners are in custody since
15.04.2026. [2026:RJ-JP:27036] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-9523/2026]
4. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and upon consideration of the submissions advanced, and particularly the fact that challan has been filed; all the offences are triable by Magistrate; the conclusion of trial will take sufficiently long time; there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners of having committed any offence of this nature in past, this Court is of the opinion that the bail applications deserve to be accepted. 7. Consequently, the bail applications are allowed. It is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely (i) Vasim Son Of Rajak, (ii) Sahwaj S/o Abdul Rasid, (iii) Astak S/o Juhru, (iv) Moin Khan S/o Aas Mohammad & (v) Mohid S/o Shahid arrested in connection with F.I.R. No.126/2026, Police Station- Jurhera, District-Deeg, shall be released on bail; provided each of them furnish a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rs. One Lakh Only) with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- (Rs.
Fifty Thousand Only) each, to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before the said Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so until completion of the trial, subject to the following conditions: (i) The petitioners shall not leave country without the permission of the Court; (ii) The petitioners shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which they are accused, or suspected, of the commission of which they are suspected; (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person
[2026:RJ-JP:27036] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-9523/2026] acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence; and (iv) In the event the petitioners are found involved in any other cyber fraud case in the future, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move an appropriate application before the learned trial Court for cancellation of the bail granted herein. (BIPIN GUPTA),J 59 to 61/MAHIMA