QAMAR AHMAD ALIAS MUNNA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
NA528/41814/2026 · 2026-09-29
Deepak Verma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 41814 of 2026 Court No. - 74 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J.
1. Heard Sri Irshad Ahmad, learned counsel for the applicants and Sri P. P. Pandey, learned AGA for the State. 2. The present 528 BNSS application has been filed to quash the impugned order dated 02.09.2026 as well as entire proceeding of complaint case No. 6583 of 2024, Under Sections 380,147,323,504,452 I.P.C. Police Station Aliganj. District Etah (Mohd. Iliyas Vs Qamar Ahmad Alias Munna and others), pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Room No.18, Etah. 3. Counsel for the applicant submits that applicant no.1 is father- in-law and applicant no.2 is brother-in-law of opposite party no.2. Earlier, applicants challenged the proceeding by way of filing Application U/s 528 No.25853 of 2026 before this Hon'ble Court and this Court vide order dated 14.07.2026, prima facie, found offence against the applicants and did not entertain the application on behalf of the applicants and directed the applicants to move discharge application, applicant, thereafter, moved discharge application, the same has been dismissed vide order dated 02.09.2026. He next submitted that applicant no.1 is a disabled person on account of that present proceeding should be quashed. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the submission raised by applicant's counsel and submits that on perusal of record, prima facie, offence is made out against the applicants. 5. Considered the argument advanced by applicants' counsel and learned AGA, it is evident that this Hon'ble Court, vide order dated 14.07.2026 considered the submission of applicants' Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Qamar Ahmad Alias Munna And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
counsel and found, prima facie, offence against the applicants and rejected the plea of the applicants and now trial court after hearing the applicants' submission found prima facie, offence against the applicants and rejected the discharge application. On perusal of submission recorded U/s 200 and 202 Cr.P.C., prima facie, offence is made out against the applicants. The order impugned dated 02.09.2026, passed by learned Magistrate, is just and proper. No interference is warranted. 6. The present 528 BNSS application of applicants is hereby dismissed with the aforesaid observation.
September 30, 2026 Nitin Verma NA528 No. 41814 of 2026 2 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- NITIN KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad