Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10342 (JHR)

BODH NARAYAN YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./531/2026 · 2026-03-30

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:8979 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 531 of 2026 ------ 1. Bodh Narayan Yadav, aged about 60 years, s/o late Mohan Yadav 2. Manish Yadav @ Manish Kumar, aged about 40 years, s/o Bodh Narayan Yadav 3. Polish Yadav, aged about 38 years, s/o Bhojo Yadav All are residents of Village-Kamalchak, P.O.+P.S.- Belbadda, Dist.-Godda … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. S.P. Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Nawin Kr. Singh, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 30.03.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioners have moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Belbadda P.S. Case No.72 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 117(2)/ 118(2)/ 109/74/352/351(2)/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of their common intention with the co-accused persons, outraged the modesty of the daughter-in-law of the informant and also attempted to murder the wife of the informant, his son as well as the informant. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the genesis of the occurrence is a petty dispute regarding drain water flowing on the road. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in paragraph no.18 of the bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioners have been in custody since 20.10.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 17 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioners undertake to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, his family members or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda, in connection with Belbadda P.S. Case No.72 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the trial of the case, with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant, his family members or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 30.03.2026 Gunjan-