Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10340 (BOM)

PUNE MUNICIPAL TRANSPORT v. SUCHITRA ASHOK DHUMAL AND ORS.

FA/1944/2005 · 2026-09-23

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

901-FA-1944-2005.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FIRST APPEAL NO.1944 OF 2005 Pune Municipal Transport ...Appellant V/s. Suchitra Ashok Dhumal and Ors. ...Respondents ***** Ms.Madhavi Tavanandi:- Advocate for Appellant. Mr.Gurunath B. Walawalkar a/w Ms.Darshana V. Chavan i/b. Mr.Shankar P. Thorat:- Advocates for Respondent Nos.1 to 4. ***** CORAM : S. M. MODAK, J. DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026 P. C. :- 1. After pronouncement of the judgment, learned Advocate for the Appellant prayed for stay to the said judgment. It is opposed on behalf of the Respondents. 2. Let stay be granted for 8 weeks subject to withdrawal by the Respondents to the tune of 50% of the amount fixed by this Court along with interest, if it is not already withdrawn, on furnishing an undertaking that they will return the amount if directed. [S. M. MODAK, J.] Satish Sangar 1/1 SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Digitally signed by SATISH RAMCHANDRA SANGAR Date: 2026.09.23 19:28:03 +0530