Sonali Mane 21-SA-650-2019.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION SECOND APPEAL NO. 650 OF 2019 Sou. Bhagyarekha Seedram Bhosale Proprietor M/S Rekha Enterprises Thr. POA Seedram Dhondiba Bhosale … Appellant Versus Shri. Rajendra Mahadev Thule Proprietor M/S Purvesh Engineering Work … Respondent Ms. Kalyani Mangave i/b Mr. Chetan G. Patil for Appellant. [ Mr. Prabhanjan Gujar a/w Ms. Heena Suvarnakar for Respondent. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATE : 22 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C. : 1) The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant invites attention of the Court to the notices issued to the Appellant. Copies of letters dated 28 August 2026 and 14 October 2024 are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. She submits that the Appellant has not responded to the said notices. She further submits that the Appeal was lodged through the Appellant's husband, who was her constituted attorney. She further submits that the Appellant's husband has apparently passed away. She further submits that, despite making best efforts, contact with the Appellant has not been established. ___Page No. 1 of 2 ___ 22 September 2026 MANE SONALI DILIP Digitally signed by MANE SONALI DILIP Date: 2026.09.23 15:05:34 +0530 Sonali Mane 21-SA-650-2019.docx 2) It appears that the Appellant has lost interest in prosecuting the Appeal. If the Appellant is interested in prosecuting the Appeal, she can apply for restoration of the same. The Appeal is pending since the year 2019 and cannot be kept pending any longer. 3) The Second Appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] ___Page No. 2 of 2 ___ 22 September 2026