HARI SHANKAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/29641/2026 · 2026-09-29
Satya Veer Singh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10333 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 29641 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE SATYA VEER SINGH, J.
1. Heard Mr. Bhagwan Dutt Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Anshul Nigam, learned Standing Counsel for State and Mr. Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent no. 11 (the Gaon Sabha). 2. Present writ petition has been filed with following main prayer:-
"(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing to respondent no. 2 to conclude and decide the Revision being Case no. 2330 of 2025 Computer Case no. C-202514000002330 under section 219 of U.P. Land Revenue Act read with Section 210 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 (Hari Shankar Mishra vs. Shobhnath and others) which is pending since 27.06.2025 before the respondent no. 2 within a stipulated period fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. Mr. Pandey draws attention of the Court to paragraph 458 of Uttar Pradesh Revenue Court Manual which provides for speedy disposal. The said paragraph 458 is reproduced below. "458. Speedy Disposal. (1) The court shall endeavour to finally decide the suit within a period of one year from the date of institution of the suit and if the suit is not decided within the period aforesaid, the reason for the same shall be recorded. (2) The appellate or the revisional court shall endeavour to finally decide the appeal or revision, as the case may be, within a period of six months from the date of filing the appeal or revision and if the appeal or revision is not decided within the aforesaid period, the reason for the same shall be recorded."
4. Learned Standing Counsel as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 11 (the Gaon Sabha) submit that no useful purpose would be served in Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bhagwan Dutt Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi, C.S.C. Hari Shankar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s)
keeping the writ petition pending. Suitable direction be issued for expeditious disposal of Revision no. 2330 of 2025 (Computer Case no. C- 202514000002330). 5. On consent, the present writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no. 2 (Additional Commissioner (Judicial-1st) Varanasi, Division Varanasi to decide the proceedings of Revision no. 2330 of 2025 (Computer Case no.
C-202514000002330) expeditiously preferably within six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 30, 2026 Jaswant WRIC No. 29641 of 2026 2 (Satya Veer Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad