Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10330 (AP)

DANDU NAVEEN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/25121/2026 · 2026-09-09

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010461412026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] THURSDAY, THE 10th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25121/2026 Between: 1. DANDU NAVEEN, S/O. JAYARAMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, OCC- PRIVATE BUSINESS R/O. D. NO. 5-16, S.0 COLONY, NOOKANAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.-524343- ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.-522238- 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT.-521001- 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CYBER CRIME POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.-520002- 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VOYALAPADU POLICE STATION, VOYALAPADU MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.517299- 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MACHAVARAM POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT.-520008 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd respondent police in interfering with the life and liberty of the petitioner and further seizing the articles (gold 2 ornaments, car vide bearing no. AP 40 Kok 3472, 3 CPUs, one I phone, 2 vivo mobiles, office documents and files and other things) of the petitioner is as illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of natural justice, violation of Art. 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and contrary to the procedure prescribed under the law and consequently direct the 3 rd respondent police to handover the articles vide (gold ornaments, car vide bearing no. AP 40 KA 3472, 3 CPUs, one iphone, 2 vivo mobiles, office documents and files and other things) to the petitioner forthwith IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the 3rd respondent police not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition IA NO: 2 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Direct the 3rd respondent police to handover the seized articles vide (gold ornaments, car vide bearing no. AP 40 KA 3472, 3 CPUs, one I phone, 2 vivo mobiles, office documents and files and other things) to the petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARASIMHULU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25121 of 2026 The Court made the following Order: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri P.Narasimhulu, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition with a liberty to work out legal remedies in accordance with the law. 2. Sri P.Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home expressed no objection for the same. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Interlocutory applications, if any, pending shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 10.09.2026 RMR 4 148 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 25121 of 2026 Date: 10.09.2026 RMR