Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 1033 (CHH)

BIRENDRA JAISWAL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

CRMP/234/2026 · 2026-02-03

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:6138-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 234 of 2026 Birendra Jaiswal S/o Lt. Sh. Shiv Pujan Jaiswal, Aged About 47 Years Residing At- Flat No. 707, 7th Floor, Srishti Palazzo, St. Xavier Road, Avanti Vihar, Telibandha, Raipur- 492006 (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Amleshwar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) 2 - Nikki Vishwakarma D/o. Shri Laxmi Narayan Vishwakarma, Aged About 25 Years R/o. Lalita Chowk Near Santoshi Mandir, Baidahi Para, P.S. Azad Chowk, Raipur, District Raipur C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Himanshu Sinha, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 04.02.2026 1. Heard Mr. Himanshu Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner. MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2026.02.05 11:03:12 +0530 2 Also heard Mr. Sourabh Sahu, learned Panel Lawyer for respondent No.1 / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the present Petition and quash the FIR registered against the Petitioner in connection with Crime.No: 149/2025, registered at Police Station Amleshwar, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) (Originally registered on zero at P.S): Azad Chowk, Raipur (C.G.) for an alleged offence punishable under section 69, 351(2), BNS, 2023 on 08/11/25., in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh stating that in the present matter, charge-sheet has already been filed against the petitioner and the same needs to be challenged further. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Learned Panel Lawyer appearing for respondent No.1 / State is present. 6. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet