Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10329 (AP)

THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED v. MS TEKURI DIVYASRI

MACMA/1538/2018 · 2026-09-18

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010440432018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3604] SATURDAY, THE 19th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1538/2018 Between: 1. THE UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY OPP GOVT JUNIOR COLLEGE, RAYACHOTY YSR DISTRICT ...APPELLANT AND 1. MS TEKURI DIVYASRI, D/O SRI VENKATESU AGED ABOUT 9 YEARS. (MINOR REP BY HER NATURAL GUARDIAN FATHER, SRI VENKATESU SIO REDDENNA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, HINDU CULTIVATION AND TIFFIN CENTRE, RESIDING AT RAMAPURAM VILLAGE MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT) 2. SRI N VENKATARAMANA, S/O. SRI N JAYANNA AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, RESIDING AT RACHAPALLI, LAKKIREDDIPALLI VILLAGE MANDAL YSR DISTRICT 3. SRI AVULAKUNTA PRADEEP, S/O. SRI PAPAIAH AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, HINDU GIDDUGURALLA RACHAPALLI YSR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC before the High Courtmay please to set aside the impugned Judgment and decree dt. 20.11.2017 passed in MVOP No. 60 of 2015 on the file the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge, Rayachoty. 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to condone the delay of 46 days in preferring the appeal against the orders dt. 20.11.2017, passed in MVOP No 60 of 2015 on the file the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge, Rayachoty and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2018 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including execution of the impugned Order and Decree dt.20.11.2017, passed in MVOP No 60 of 2015, on the file the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-V Additional District Judge, Rayachoty and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to permit the petitioner to withdraw the 50% of the deposited amount, deposited by the appellant in pursuance of the orders of this Hon’ble Court, dated 21.06.2018 in I.A. of 2018 in M.A.C.M.A.No.1538 of 2015 against M.V.O.P.No.60 of 2015 on the file of the Court of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-Cum-V Additional District Judge, Rayachoty and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. MOHAMMED ABDUL RAHIM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1538/2018 JUDGMENT: 1. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. On the last occasion also there was no representation on behalf of the appellant. It shows that appellant has no interest to prosecute the appeal. 2. In the result, this appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. ___________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM,J Date: 19.09.2026 SSA/GNP 4 91 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1538/2018 Date: 19.09.2026 SSA/GNP