IN THE HIGH C Sr. No. 208 Rajiv Kumar The Union Territory CORAM : HON'B HON'B Present : None Mr. An for the DEEPAK SIBAL, 1. As pe informed that the p same, none appears 2. Dismis 13.02.2026 shamsher IGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYAN Versus erritory of Chandigarh and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BA None for the petitioner. . Anil Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent(s)-UT, Chandigarh. * * * * * AL, J. (Oral) As per office report, learned counse t the present petition is listed for hear ppears on behalf of the petitioner. Dismissed in default. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No RYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21832-2024 Date of decision : 13.02.2026 ..…Petitioner ..... Respondents AK SIBAL A BANERJI igarh. counsel for the parties had been r hearing today but in spite of the [DEEPAK SIBAL] JUDGE [LAPITA BANERJI] JUDGE s / No s / No SHAMSHER SINGH 2026.02.17 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Punjab and haryana high court, chandigarh