SMT. MADHUBALA RATHORE W/O RAM PRASAD PANCHOLI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/9066/2026 · 2026-07-20
Rekha Borana
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10324 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 10324 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:27768] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9066/2026 URN: CW / 20065U / 2026 Smt. Madhubala Rathore W/o Ram Prasad Pancholi, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Anand Vihar, Swarn Mandir, Bhuvneshwati Private I.T. I. N.H. 12, Kota Road, Tonk ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan Bikaner
3. District Education Officer, Secondary Education Tonk (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.D. Meena HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA BORANA
Order 20/07/2026
1. Vide the present writ petition, charge-sheet dated 19.10.2022 has been assailed. It has been submitted that in pursuance to charge-sheet dated 19.10.2022, disciplinary proceedings have already been initiated and inquiry report dated 17.12.2025 has also been furnished by the Inquiry Officer to the Disciplinary Authority. Even, representation dated 24.12.2025 qua the inquiry report has been submitted by the petitioner.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that despite it been more than six months since the representation been filed by the petitioner, the Disciplinary Authority has not taken any decision thereupon and meanwhile the petitioner stood retired. Now, on
[2026:RJ-JP:27768] (2 of 2) [CW-9066/2026] the pretext of the pending disciplinary proceedings, her retiral benefits have been withheld.
3. After hearing the counsel and going through the record, this Court is not inclined to interfere with charge-sheet dated
19.10.2022. However, keeping into consideration the subsequent
facts, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the Disciplinary Authority to take a final decision within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the present order.
4. Needless to observe that the Disciplinary Authority, while taking the final decision, shall be under an obligation to take into
consideration the submissions as made by the petitioner in her representation.
5. Stay petition and pending applications, if any, stand
disposed of.
(REKHA BORANA),J 108/ARVIND