Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 10324 (CHH)

SMT. YSOMATI VERMA v. MAHESH PRASAD DHRUV

MAC/601/2019 · 2026-05-06

Shri Sanjay K Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:21386 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MAC No. 601 of 2019 1 - Smt. Ysomati Verma W/o Late Shri Ramesh Kumar Verma Aged About 40 Years R/o Village - Hasda, Post - Hasda, Police Station And Tahsil - Berla, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ku. Surbhi Verma D/o Late Shri Ramesh Kumar Verma Aged About 16 Years Minor On Behalf Of Through Their Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Ysomati Verma, Appellant No. 1) R/o Village - Hasda, Post - Hasda, Police Station And Tahsil - Berla, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh., 3 - Ku. Shruti Verma D/o Late Shri Ramesh Kuamr Verma Aged About 15 Years Minor On Behalf Of Through Their Legal Guardian Mother Smt. Ysomati Verma, Appellant No. 1) R/o Village - Hasda, Post - Hasda, Police Station And Tahsil - Berla, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. (Claimants) ... Appellants versus 1 - Mahesh Prasad Dhruv S/o Sunhar Singh Dhruv Aged About 34 Years R/o Som Cold Store, Ward No.11, Banjari Nagar, Birgaon, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Driver Of Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration No. Cg 04 Lr/4321), 2 - Indranil Ghosh S/o Kantikumar Ghosh R/o A/801, Walfort Height, Ring Road, No.1, Bhatagaon Raipur, Tahsil And District KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Digitally signed by KRISHNA KUMAR BARVE Date: 2026.05.07 20:11:30 +0530 2 Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Registered Owner Of Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration No.Cg 04 Lr/4321), 3 - The New India Assurance Company Limited, Through Branch Manager, Branch Office, Second Floor, R.D.A. Building, Bajrang Market G.E. Road, Raipur, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh. (Insurer Of Vehicle Truck Bearing Registration No. Cg 04 Lr/4321) ... Respondent(s) For Appellants : None. For Respondent(s) : None. (Single Bench) Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 07/05/2026 1. None appears on behalf of the appellants in two rounds. No representation was made. Even on 13.6.2025, 10.11.2025 & 30.4.2026 also none appeared on behalf of the appellants. 2. Even otherwise, compensation of Rs.43,94,320/- has been awarded by the concerned Claims Tribunal. 3. In that view of the matter, the Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Barve